In public, Europe and China appear to be drifting further apart. Political speeches stress “de-risking,” strategic autonomy, and reduced dependence. Headlines focus on trade disputes, sanctions, and geopolitical tension. Yet beneath this official narrative, a different reality is taking shape.
European businesses are returning to China.
Not loudly. Not ceremonially. But decisively.
Investment flows from Europe into China have accelerated again, reaching levels not seen in several years. German manufacturers are expanding capacity. European automakers are deepening joint ventures. Chemical, industrial, and high-end manufacturing firms are committing fresh capital. This is not nostalgia for the past decade of globalization. It is a calculated move driven by economics, scale, and competitive survival.
Politics may set the tone. Markets set the direction.
A Quiet Reversal After the “De-Risking” Peak
Over the past few years, European policymakers promoted the idea of reducing exposure to China. The language was careful: not “decoupling,” but “de-risking.” In theory, companies were expected to diversify supply chains, shift production, and lower strategic dependence.
Many firms did exactly that — on paper.
In practice, de-risking reached its natural limit quickly. Diversification increased costs. Alternative markets failed to match China’s scale, infrastructure, and speed. Supply chains became more complex, not more resilient. For industries operating on thin margins and long planning cycles, this proved unsustainable.
The result was not a clean exit from China, but a pause. And pauses in global business rarely last.
By late 2025 and early 2026, European investment momentum in China began to rebuild. Not as a political statement, but as an operational necessity.
China’s Market Remains Structurally Irreplaceable
For European companies, China is not just another export destination. It is a full industrial ecosystem.
China offers:
-
unmatched manufacturing depth
-
dense supplier networks
-
advanced logistics infrastructure
-
a massive domestic market
-
rapidly evolving consumer demand
Replacing this ecosystem is not a short-term project. In many sectors, it is not realistic at all.
Automotive firms illustrate this clearly. China is the world’s largest car market and the most competitive arena for electric vehicles. European brands that step back do not preserve safety; they lose relevance. Innovation in batteries, software integration, and production efficiency is happening fastest inside China.
To remain globally competitive, European automakers cannot afford to observe from the sidelines.
Investment as a Defensive Strategy
Much of the renewed European investment in China is defensive rather than expansionist.
Companies are not chasing aggressive growth targets. They are protecting existing positions.
Market share lost in China is difficult to regain. Local competitors move fast. Supply chains reconfigure around whoever stays. Technology standards evolve without latecomers. For European firms, withdrawal risks long-term exclusion.
In this context, investing in China is less about optimism and more about preventing erosion.
Executives understand that political alignment does not guarantee market access. Presence does.
Germany’s Industrial Logic
Nowhere is this dynamic clearer than in Germany.
German industry is built on long investment cycles, high capital intensity, and export-driven competitiveness. China has become deeply embedded in this model over two decades. Machinery, chemicals, automotive components, and industrial systems rely on Chinese demand and Chinese production networks.
German firms face rising costs at home, energy constraints, and slowing European growth. China, despite its own economic challenges, still offers scale and industrial continuity.
For German executives, the choice is stark: invest where industrial logic works, or retreat into structurally weaker markets.
Politics cannot rewrite balance sheets.
The Limits of Political Signaling
European governments continue to issue warnings about overexposure. Companies listen — but selectively.
Public messaging and private strategy are increasingly disconnected. Firms adopt compliance frameworks, diversify marginal suppliers, and adjust language. At the same time, core investments remain anchored in China.
This dual approach allows businesses to satisfy political expectations without undermining competitiveness.
It also reveals an uncomfortable truth: political signaling has limited influence over corporate capital allocation when structural incentives point elsewhere.
China’s Changed Value Proposition
China today is not the China of a decade ago. Growth is slower. Regulation is stricter. Competition is fiercer. Yet for European firms, China’s value proposition has evolved rather than diminished.
China is no longer just a low-cost manufacturing base. It is:
-
a center of applied innovation
-
a testbed for large-scale deployment
-
a source of industrial learning
European firms increasingly use China as a laboratory. Products are developed, refined, and stress-tested there before global rollout. The pace of iteration is difficult to replicate elsewhere.
This makes China strategically relevant even when short-term returns are uncertain.
Risk Reframed, Not Removed
European companies are not ignoring risk. They are redefining it.
Political risk is weighed against market risk. Regulatory uncertainty is balanced against technological stagnation. Supply chain dependence is compared to loss of competitive edge.
In this recalibration, staying engaged in China often appears less risky than disengaging.
This does not mean blind commitment. Firms structure investments carefully. They localize operations. They limit exposure where possible. They build optionality.
But they do not exit.
A Multipolar Business Reality
European business strategy increasingly reflects a multipolar world rather than a values-aligned bloc system.
Companies operate across jurisdictions with conflicting political priorities. They adapt rather than align. Neutrality becomes a strategy, not a moral position.
China fits into this reality as one of several indispensable poles.
The idea that global business would neatly follow geopolitical fault lines underestimated the inertia of industrial systems and the pragmatism of corporate decision-making.
What This Means for Europe
Europe faces a strategic contradiction.
On one hand, it seeks greater autonomy and resilience. On the other, its industrial champions rely on global integration to remain viable. China sits at the center of this tension.
European businesses returning to China signal a gap between ambition and capacity. Without equivalent scale, innovation speed, and market depth at home or in alternative regions, calls for disengagement ring hollow.
The return to China is not a rejection of European policy. It is a reflection of economic gravity.
The Long View
This renewed engagement does not mark a return to the old globalization model. It is more cautious, more segmented, and more politically aware.
European companies are not betting on harmony. They are betting on relevance.
China remains too large, too complex, and too central to global industry to ignore. For European business, staying involved is not about choosing sides. It is about staying in the game.
Politics may shape the environment. But capital, in the end, follows structure.
And the structure still points to China.
